The Australian Medical Association Limited and state AMA entities comply with the Privacy Act 1988. Please refer to the AMA Privacy Policy to understand our commitment to you and information on how we store and protect your data.

×

Search

×
08 Jun 2017

AMA President, Dr Michael Gannon, said this week that the AMA welcomes the opportunity to discuss reform of after-hours primary care services following recommendations from the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Review Taskforce in its preliminary report, released on Wednesday.

Dr Gannon said the recommendations, contained in the report, Urgent after-hours primary care services funded through the MBS, are subject to further consultation and are not yet Government policy.

Key recommendations of the preliminary report include:

  • restricting the use of the high value urgent after-hours items so that medical deputising service doctors and practitioners working predominantly in the after-hours period are excluded from billing these items;
  • providing a clearer definition of what is considered to be urgent for the purposes of the MBS urgent after-hours items, including changing the requirement to ‘urgent assessment’ as opposed to ‘urgent treatment’; and
  • removing the current right of patients to make an urgent after-hours appointment two hours before the commencement of the after-hours period.

Dr Gannon said the AMA believes that access to after-hours GP services is a critical part of the health system. He added that after-hours services should complement the services provided by a patient’s usual GP or general practice, not displace them.

The AMA supports after-hours reform for a number of reasons, including:

  • the significant growth in the use of after-hours Medicare items, particularly the use of urgent after-hours items, and the detrimental impact this is having on the link between patients and their usual GP or general practice;
  • concern that direct marketing and the promotion of after-hours home visiting services as being free and easy to access is driving much of this growth, as opposed to genuine patient need; and
  • poor communication from some after-hours medical services to a patient’s usual GP or general practice – resulting in the fragmentation of care.

Dr Gannon said there has been a proliferation of after-hours medical services that have no links to general practice, which is very different to the traditional medical deputising model.

“We will review the Taskforce’s preliminary report, and provide a formal response in coming weeks. If the final report and subsequent Government after-hours policy lead to MBS savings, they must be re-invested back into general practice” Dr Gannon said.

Full media release


Published: 08 Jun 2017