AMA NATIONAL CONFERENCE 25 MAY – 27 MAY 2012
GRAND HYATT HOTEL, MELBOURNE
The AMA National Conference 2012 – celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Federal AMA – will be held at the Grand Hyatt Hotel, Melbourne, from 25-27 May.
The Minister for Health, The Hon Tanya Plibersek MP, and the Shadow Minister for Health and Ageing, The Hon Peter Dutton MP, will both address the Conference on Friday 25 May.
Chief Climate Commissioner, Professor Tim Flannery, will address the Conference on Saturday morning, and Sunday’s keynote speaker is Professor the Lord Darzi of Denham PC KBE, former Health Minister in the United Kingdom and Chair of Surgery at St Mary’s Hospital in London.
Conference highlights include:
Friday 25 May
10.00am Welcome to Country
Official Opening and Address
Professor David Haslam
President, British Medical Association
10.30am Policy Session: Leading for Difference
Women in Medicine: Dr Christine Bennett, Dean of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Sydney; Former Chair, National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission
Leading Medical Workforce Development: The Hon Jim McGinty, Chair, Health Workforce Australia
11.30am **National Health Policy Overview**
Address by the Minister for Health, The Hon Tanya Plibersek MP
Address by Shadow Minister for Health and Ageing, The Hon Peter Dutton MP
2.00pm Policy Session: Global Health on our Doorstep
Dr Nick Coatsworth, President, Médecins Sans Frontières, Australia
Associate Professor Christine Phillips, Social Foundations of Medicine, ANU
Benedict David, Principal Sector Specialist, Health, AusAid
Saturday 26 May
9.00am Policy Session: Health and the Environment
Professor Tim Flannery, Chief Climate Commissioner
Professor Rob Adams, Director City Design, City of Melbourne
11.00am Awards ceremony
AMA/ACOSH National Tobacco Control Scoreboard Award – for best efforts by governments in tobacco control
AMA/ACOSH Dirty Ashtray Award – for worst efforts by governments in tobacco control
Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) Award – best original research published in the MJA
2.00pm Policy Session: Indigenous Health
Launch of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Audit Report: Progress to date and the challenges that remain – AMA President Dr Steve Hambleton
Presentation of the AMA Indigenous People’s Medical Scholarship
2.30pm Policy Session: Mental Health: Where to from here?
Dr Brian Morton, Chair, AMA Council of General Practice
Dr Bill Pring, Private Mental Health Alliance
Sunday 27 May
9.00am Keynote Address
Professor the Lord Darzi of Denham PC KBE, Former Health Minister in the United Kingdom, and Chair of Surgery at St Mary’s Hospital in London
9.45am Policy sessions
e-Health
Dr Chris Mitchell, Change and Adoption Lead, NEHTA
Dr Chris Pearce, NEHTA Clinical Lead
MBBS vs MD
Professor Geoff McColl, Deputy Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Services, University of Melbourne
Dr Rob Marshall, Immediate Past President, AMSA
Media wishing to attend the Conference are invited to register by contacting Kirsty Waterford on 02 6270 5464 or 0427 209 753.
There is a media conference room available and arrangements can be made for interviews with speakers at the end of each session.
23 May 2012
CONTACT: John Flannery 02 6270 5477 / 0419 494 761
Kirsty Waterford 02 6270 5464 / 0427 209 753
![]() ANF pay claim for practice nurses – Important update Last year, the Australian Nursing Federation (ANF) made an application to Fair Work Australia (FWA) for a low paid bargaining authorisation for practice nurses, which in effect seeks to impose an enterprise agreement on around 900 medical practices. The AMA appeared in preliminary proceedings before FWA on 19 December 2011 to oppose the ANF’s claim and over 140 practices have provided the AMA with the authority to appear on their behalf in these proceedings. Hearings will be held in the week beginning 25 June 2012, although an urgent hearing to address several defects in the ANF’s application has been scheduled for 1 June 2012 following a request from the AMA. Many practices who are named in the ANF’s claim appear to have ignored it and are not currently represented before FWA. The claim at this stage affects practices in Tasmania, Victoria and NSW. It is not too late for practices that have been sent the ANF claim to give the AMA an authority to act on their behalf. We will provide this representation at no cost for members. A pro-forma authority to act is available here. The AMA has engaged a team of specialist industrial lawyers from Moray and Agnew to appear in these proceedings and it is anticipated that we will call 15 witnesses in the case, including expert economic evidence. Practice nurses play a valuable role in caring for patients and their utilisation in medical practices has grown significantly, particularly in recent years. The ANF’s claim clearly has the potential to interfere with existing employment arrangements that are working well at the local level and, as a result, reduce patient access to care. In this context, the AMA will continue to invest significant resources to resist the ANF’s claim to ensure that practices are able to negotiate appropriate working conditions that meet the needs of practices and nurses alike. The AMA is also concerned at the potential for this claim to spread to other practices. If you have any questions regarding the ANF’s application for a low paid bargaining authorisation, please do not hesitate to contact your local state/territory AMA. ANAO Conducting Audit Of GP Super Clinics Program The AMA welcomes advice that the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) last week commenced an official audit of the Government’s troubled GP Super Clinics Program. The AMA has been calling for the audit since October last year. The ANAO will assess the effectiveness of the Department of Health and Ageing's (DoHA) administration of the GP Super Clinics Program, which was intended to support improved community access to integrated GP and primary health care services. AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton said that the GP Super Clinics Program is a failed initiative in concept, design and implementation, and that a proper audit is overdue. He added that the AMA is not opposed to the establishment of GP Super Clinics, but they must be located in areas of community need, rather than in areas of political advantage. “The public deserves answers about what is happening with a significant investment of taxpayer money. Hopefully the Auditor-General will get to the bottom of these problems. “If the Program is found to be failing, the AMA recommends that the GP Super Clinic funding be redirected to support new infrastructure and services for existing general practices,” Dr Hambleton said. Click here to view the full press release. AMA calls for urgent meeting regarding Federal Budget PIP Cuts Dr Hambleton wrote this week to the Minister for Health and Ageing, raising concerns about the impact of cuts announced in the 2012-13 Federal Budget to the Practice Incentive Payments (PIP) program, including the decision to remove access to the e-Health incentive unless practices participate in the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system. The letter expressed disappointment that the engine room of the health system, general practice, is once again the target of funding cuts and that the cessation of the General Practice Immunisation Incentive withdraws essential support for practices to undertake a very pro-active approach to encouraging parents to have their children vaccinated. Dr Hambleton stated in the letter that requiring practices to participate in the PCEHR to receive the PIP eHealth Incentive will undermine the Government’s efforts to make the PCEHR a success and that it is too early to force participation as there is still much work to be done before medical practices can confidently adopt the PCEHR into their day-to-day operations and meet the legal obligations imposed by the PCEHR legislation. This is in addition to no funding being made available to support an important new service involved in preparing the Shared Health Summary (SHS). AMA President address to the Committee for Economic Development of Australia Dr Hambleton addressed the Committee for Economic Development of Australia (CEDA) - Health Industry Overview forum this week with a speech entitled “Health Reform – From Big Bang to a Whimper”. Dr Hambleton said that the biggest element of health reform now confronting us is electronic health, specifically the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR). “The AMA is a great supporter of, and advocate for, accurate electronic communication. It is the future. “We support the introduction of the PCEHR – but it has to be the right PCEHR. “Most AMA members are enthusiastic about the shared electronic health record vision. They know that, with the right system, they can improve the patient healthcare experience”, Dr Hambleton said. Dr Hambleton expressed concern over the Government’s requirement that general practices participate in the PCEHR in order to attract ehealth practice incentive payments. “There is plenty of commentary recognising that general practice will have to make the most investment in the PCEHR both in time and money and will realise the least amount of benefit from it. “Doctors need greater support than what is on offer if the PCEHR is going to truly work to improve patient care and reduce waste and risk in health care”, Dr Hambleton said. Click here to view AMA President’s speech to CEDA. Changes to the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program New restrictions to the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) were announced in the 2012-13 Budget. From 9 May 2012, no new organisations or nurses can join the Program unless existing participants leave, and organisations and nurses will need to maintain client services at existing levels. Additional funding of $16.5 million for MHNIP was provided in the 2012-13 Budget, but this was only to ensure 2011-12 service levels are maintained throughout 2012-13, while an evaluation of the program is undertaken. The changes mean that the MHNIP, which allows eligible organisations who engage mental health nurses to assist in the provision of coordinated clinical care for people with severe mental disorders, will be prevented from delivering benefits to a significant number of patients in need. This Program has been in great demand, with over 40,000 people being provided with a MHNIP service in 2010-11. That is 4,000 more than originally anticipated by the Department of Health and Ageing. Based on current uptake, according to the Department, the annual number of people receiving a service may exceed 47,000 for the 2011-12 financial year. Guidelines and resources on prescribing drugs of addiction The AMA Therapeutics Committee has developed a ‘one-stop-shop’ web page for AMA members providing links to key guidelines, resources and other information available to support medical practitioners prescribing drugs of addiction. The links include:
You can view the Prescribing drugs of addiction support page at: http://ama.com.au/prescribing-drugs-addiction-members-support-page. (Remember you need to log in with your member details first.) A direct link to the page is also located on the AMA members' home page in the box titled AMA information and resources. We welcome your comments and suggestions as well. Please tell us what you think.
Tell us how you protect your work files, media, programs and data to go into draw to WIN a $500 gift voucher.
We speak with hundreds of local doctors and medical practices about their IT back-up needs and here are our top 5 tips for backing up your critical data. |
|
|
An increasing number of Australians are at a high risk of serious disease and premature death because of excess body weight or obesity. The National Health and Medical Research Council's (NHMRC) Clinical Guidelines on the Management of Overweight and Obesity is an important resource for medical practitioners who identify and support patients who are overweight and obese. Medical practitioners also play a preventive role in identifying those patients who are at risk of becoming overweight, particularly children and young people.
The AMA believes that a key challenge is to ensure that the Clinical Guidelines are practical and easy for medical practitioners to adopt as part of their clinical practice. The AMA's Submission highlights the key role of medical practitioners in preventing overweight and obesity, particularly among children and young people, as well as providing support to those patients who wish to lose or maintain their current body weight. The AMA Submission advocates around the development (with appropriate consultation) of practical resources, such as short term eating plans, evidence summaries, multi media videos and fact sheets that can support medical practitioners and patients in this area.
| Attachments | Size |
|---|---|
| 69.15 KB |
As a supporter of Food Allergy Awareness Week 2012, the AMA is urging enhanced public education programs to raise community awareness of potential food allergies and help people identify food products that may pose a risk to their health and the health of others.
Food Allergy Awareness Week, an initiative of Anaphylaxis Australia, promotes and develops the awareness of food allergy among Australians through education, research and ongoing support.
AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said today that there are 170 foods that are known to trigger an allergic reaction.
“Milk, eggs, peanuts, tree nuts, sesame, wheat and soy are the most common, causing 90 per cent of all reactions,” Dr Hambleton said.
“Many of these foods can be present in unlikely food sources, and this is an important reason for more comprehensive public education about these possibilities.
“The AMA will back public education programs to build community awareness of food allergies and to help the many thousands of Australian families dealing with the effects of food allergies every day.”
Dr Hambleton noted that the Australian Food and Grocery Council (AFGC) had this week stated that food labelling is important when it comes to consumers making healthy choices, a position shared with the AMA.
Background:
The AMA welcomes advice that the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) last week commenced an official audit of the Government’s troubled GP Super Clinics Program.
The ANAO will assess the effectiveness of the Department of Health and Ageing's (DoHA) administration of the GP Super Clinics Program, which was intended to support improved community access to integrated GP and primary health care services.
Amid reports of Super Clinics in financial difficulties and other Super Clinics not proceeding, the AMA last October wrote to the ANAO urging an audit of the Program.
The AMA was advised that an audit was already being conducted by DoHA, but this audit did not involve consultation with outside organisations or stakeholders. The DoHA audit has not been made public.
AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said today that the GP Super Clinics Program is a failed initiative in concept, design and implementation, and that a proper audit is overdue.
“The AMA is not opposed to the establishment of GP Super Clinics in areas where there is a clear need for them,” Dr Hambleton said.
“However, in terms of planning, the location of clinics appears to be largely a political process that is not necessarily linked to community need.
“It was intended for 36 GP Super Clinics to be operating by the end of this financial year but, according to the DoHA website, there are now only 24 Clinics that are either partly or fully operational.
“Clearly, the Government is falling well short of its own targets
“Further, the Government had to financially bail out the Redcliffe GP Super Clinic in Brisbane and made a decision not to proceed with the planned Sorell Clinic in Tasmania.
“The $25 million GP Super Clinic in Modbury, SA, opened with no doctors and, more recently, the provider that had been staffing the Clinic for the past 12 months withdrew from the contract, leaving no permanent doctors working at the Clinic.
“These are just some examples of the problems with the Program. The public deserves answers about what is happening with a significant investment of taxpayer money. Hopefully the Auditor-General will get to the bottom of these problems.
“If the Program is found to be failing, the AMA recommends that the GP Super Clinic funding be redirected to support new infrastructure and services for existing general practices,” Dr Hambleton said.
Speech: AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton
TO THE COMMITTEE FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF AUSTRALIA (CEDA), MELBOURNE, WEDNESDAY 16 MAY 2012
Just a few short years ago, we were in the middle of what was being called the biggest reform of the Australian health system since Medicare.
There was excitement in the air.
And, of course, there was caution and concern and consultation … lots and lots of consultation.
There was a mood for change, but change to ‘what’ and ‘how’?
Like most groups in the health sector, the AMA was supportive of ‘big bang’ reform, just as long as it was the right ‘big bang’ reform.
A lot of the plans – many of which had been recommended by the National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission – had the conditional support of the AMA.
We were firmly engaged in the reform process.
We supported the idea of a single funder, the end of the blame game, greater responsibility and accountability, enhanced safety and quality, less waste, and a guarantee of clinical input to decision making.
Then political circumstances changed and political courage fell away.
The unique ‘once in a generation opportunity’ for genuine health reform fell away.
State Governments changed complexion and COAG became a battleground once again.
The Government changed leaders and faced a tough election with the polls working against it.
And then we had minority Government … and chaos.
The ‘big bang’ became a ‘small bang’ and then all we had left was a sparkler.
To be fair, the Government has pushed through some pieces of the original health reform big picture.
There are Medicare Locals and Local Hospital Networks, a Pricing Authority, a Performance Authority, a Safety and Quality body, and a national funding pool.
The AMA likes some bits, dislikes other bits, and is seeking changes where there is insufficient input or management from doctors.
It will be some time before these changes are fully bedded down, and even longer before we know the impact on patients and communities.
But, in a difficult and dramatically altered political environment, we must be thankful for some change.
So where does that leave us?
Realistically, the biggest element of health reform now confronting us is electronic health, with the biggest headline item being the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record – the PCEHR.
I want to concentrate on e-health today. It is the health reform ‘news’.
As a busy general practitioner, I am personally always interested in improving productivity in health care.
A key productivity tool in health is the electronic health record. While it will take longer in general practice, it should save both time and lives in the rest of the health system.
The PCEHR – due to commence implementation from 1 July this year - holds the promise of reducing adverse events and reducing duplication of treatment.
Most AMA members are enthusiastic about the shared electronic health record vision. They know that, with the right system, they can improve the patient healthcare experience.
And hopefully save themselves some time in quickly and accurately understanding the nature of the patient’s problem based on ready access to reliable health information.
The right sort of shared record system will help doctors deliver better care.
They will have important information about their patients to help them make good clinical decisions.
We know that if we just share an accurate medication list, lives will be saved. Some of my elderly patients can only tell me the colour and size of their tablets.
These days it is very important to know whether those little blue pills they take at night are round or diamond shaped. One makes the heart stronger, the other might wear the heart out.
With new patients to the practice it often takes quite a while to work out that medication list. Often there is no choice but to phone the last pharmacy to piece the information together.
With a properly constructed e-health record, I could confirm my assumptions by reading the medication prescribed by the last doctor. Or even see what has been dispensed by the last pharmacy.
This would be an improvement over the current situation, and would save time.
A good system will save extra costs for duplicate tests when the originals can't be found or retrieving them would take too long. Treatment can happen more quickly and better decisions can be made.
The proposed system could be improved to make it much more useful to treating doctors. A past AMA President, Dr Mukesh Haikerwal, has tried to facilitate this through NEHTA by engaging Clinical Leads. They need to be listened to.
The introduction for this forum today notes the importance of getting the technological landscape right for e-health. I agree.
But today I also want to point out that introducing technology reform needs the right policy setting.
It needs an e-health policy environment that recognises that health care providers are keen to implement e-health for their patients – but only in a ‘light touch’ regulatory environment.
If the burden looks too great in time, cost and resources needed for the task, very few will adopt the new system.
The reality of patients having to opt-in means that, when doctors look for a patient’s record, they will often find there isn’t one.
The PCEHR has been designed from an ideological point of view.
Patients will decide if they want one. But there is no information about what the opt-in rate will be. We might have fast take-up by patients, or it might be very slow.
In the meantime, in clinical practice there are only so many times that doctors are going to stop and look to see if their patient has opted in and given them access to their PCEHR.
If doctors were to find that most of their patients had a PCEHR, they would be more likely to keep using the system. We hope that the opt-in feature proves successful.
We know that, from 1 July, patients will be able to register for their PCEHR.
Just last week the Government launched the e-health.gov.au website. Through that website, the Government is encouraging patients to register an interest in having a PCEHR.
But there is still much work to be done to roll the system out to hospitals and general practices.
There is still uncertainty about when and how well the system will be connected to health care providers. There is a lot of technical work being done behind the scenes.
And there is still a long way to go until we have appropriate, interoperable, tested, and affordable practice software to connect doctors and nurses to the system. Every practice will need an upgrade.
At this stage, the Government strategy appears to be a ‘build it and they will come’ approach to supporting healthcare providers like me to tool up to use the PCEHR.
As announced in last week’s Budget, the Government will require general practices like mine to participate in the PCEHR in order to attract e-health practice incentive payments.
The Government is going to force us to make an investment in terms of redesigning our practices’ processes to integrate a system that, at this stage, we have relatively little information about. This is a ‘stick’ to encourage us to do more for the same reward.
There is plenty of commentary recognising that general practice will have to make the most investment in the PCEHR both in time and money and will realise the least amount of benefit from it – and that is a real concern for us.
It will be interesting to see how non-GP specialist medical practices warm to the PCEHR without any incentives at all.
The legislation underpinning the PCEHR carries a lot of new obligations for medical practices, hospitals and other organisations providing health care.
There is a large administrative impact on medical practices.
Medical practitioners who decide to use the system will have to adapt their clinical workflows and train their staff to work within the requirements of the legislation.
Doctors will have to consider the impact of this additional workload, and the changes to clinical workflow, on the fees they charge their patients.
As I said, the biggest impact will be on GPs.
GPs will take on the role of “nominated healthcare providers” and create and maintain the “shared health summary”. This is a key feature of the PCEHR.
But without specific MBS items for this work, it will have to be absorbed into the standards consultations.
As things stand, GPs are being asked to provide a new service for free.
Providing a shared health summary is a very specific task requiring clinical skills.
GPs will work with their patients to ensure that a complete and accurate summary is available to be used by other health care providers in their clinical decisions.
It is only reasonable that patients should receive an additional Medicare rebate for this very important additional service.
There needs to be some investment by Government to support medical practices that are private businesses – to invest in the infrastructure that is needed to make the PCEHR work. There needs to be a business case.
Doctors need greater support than that what is on offer if the PCEHR is going to truly work to improve patient care and reduce waste and risk in health care.
The AMA is a great supporter of, and advocate for, accurate electronic communication. It is the future.
We support the introduction of the PCEHR – but it has to be the right PCEHR.
At the moment, we do not think the proposed PCEHR is the right PCEHR. And the Minister knows our view.
The implementation process may start on 1 July but the completion of the implementation will be some time off, unless there is genuine consultation and agreement on the final product.
16 May 2012
CONTACT: John Flannery 02 6270 5477 / 0419 494 761
Kirsty Waterford 02 6270 5464 / 0427 209 753
Follow the AMA Media on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ama_media
Follow the AMA President on Twitter: http://twitter.com/amapresident
The AMA considers there is a critical need for device registries to be established in Australia. Such registries will need to be funded by government, as the AMA previously advised in its submission to the Committee in July 2011. The need for device registries has only been highlighted by the PIP breast implant incident.
The Committee’s current inquiry considers the ability of the TGA to undertake or commission research in relation to specific areas of concern regarding devices, such as metal-on-metal implants (item (g) of the terms of reference).
The AMA considers that it is more important to look forwards, rather than look backwards. Sufficient evidence exists demonstrating that patient safety is best managed with the use of clinical registries. The National Joint Replacement Registry (NJRR) was instrumental in Australia being the first country to withdraw the DePuy metal-on-metal hip joint replacement device after a high rate of failure.
Implantable devices are likely to always have a failure rate. Clinical registries allow a robust assessment and comparison of devices, both in the short term and over longer time periods. They allow medical practitioners and the TGA to respond appropriately when there is a clear failure of a device that is beyond that of like products. For example, a breast implant registry could have provided early evidence of the failure rate of PIP breast implants compared to other breast implants.
Clinical registries allow medical practitioners to identify problems early, respond appropriately in a coordinated manner and support clinical decisions about which devices are delivering the best patient outcomes in particular clinical circumstances.
Consideration should also be given to clinical registries being provided with the capacity to record information which would allow the registry operators to track devices to individual patients. This would assist in the case of device failure rates justifying patient recalls.
The NJRR is a premium example of a clinical registry that collects and provides high quality data on the performance of joint prostheses, and is internationally renowned. The NJRR allows the Australian Orthopaedic Association (AOA) to monitor the performance of surgeons against their peers. The NJRR information also assists the TGA to remove unsafe and non‑performing devices from the Australian Register of Therapeutic Goods.
The NJRR was established by the AOA with Commonwealth Government funding; it is operated however independent of government by the AOA. This ensures that the structure and nature of the registry is absolutely fit for purpose. An under-funded and under-resourced registry will not provide the appropriate data quality that would enable medical practitioners and the TGA to act with confidence when the data shows that a device has failed or precipitated other clinical concerns.
Clinical registries are a valuable and cost effective way to undertake post-market assessment. The benefits to the Australian community, both in terms of individual health outcomes and overall health expenditure, and the public interest in guaranteeing independent governance of clinical registries, justifies government funding.
If we are to improve post‑market assessment of medical devices and patient safety in Australia, the AMA considers it is essential that sufficient, appropriately funded clinical registries be established for the broader range of clinical devices now available. This is particularly the case when the device is implanted in a vital organ such as neurological shunts and intra-cardiac devices.
The AMA considers there is a clear role for government to maintain funding to clinical registries that are established and independently operated by the relevant medical specialties as exemplified by the NJRR model. We note that while the Commonwealth’s costs of the NJRR are met by a levy on device suppliers, these costs are passed on to patients. We believe this is a cost that it is reasonable for the entire Australian community to share, rather than imposing it on those individuals whose lives have been saved or improved by medical devices.
In summary, the AMA considers the TGA’s role in post-market regulation will be substantially strengthened by the introduction of more and relevant sufficiently resourced clinical implantable device registries. There is a clear role for the TGA to work with the specialty medical craft groups to develop or enhance implantable device registries to monitor device performance and to plan clinically appropriate and coordinated responses to device failures to the benefit of the Australian community.
APRIL 2012
Contact
Georgia Morris
Senior Policy Advisor
Medical Practice and eHealth
Australian Medical Association
Ph: (02) 6270 5466
gmorris@ama.com.au
| Attachments | Size |
|---|---|
| 106.53 KB |
Food provides our bodies with the energy, protein, essential fats, vitamins and minerals to live, grow and function properly. Concerning trends have been observed in the eating habits of many Australians and the implications are serious. The National Health and Medical Research Council's (NHMRC) Draft Australian Dietary Guidelines 2011 provides population level guidance on healthy eating patterns and related guidance for health professionals.
The AMA's Submission highlights that a range of measures is needed to improve nutritional literacy, including education on energy needs and portion sizes, improved food labelling, and affordable access to healthy food options. The AMA Submission also identifies a need for practical resources aimed at medical practitioners including access to a database of locally available supports such dieticians, healthy cooking classes and walking groups.
| Attachments | Size |
|---|---|
| 74.36 KB |
The 2012-13 Federal Budget, handed down on 8 May, contains a number of measures affecting the health sector. To help explain these measures, the AMA has commissioned Kilham Consulting to provide AMA members with an electronic overview of the Health Budget. The views contained are those of Kilham Consulting.
In a very tight budget constrained by the Government’s strong desire to achieve a surplus in 2012-13, the health sector has avoided large cuts in spending. The most significant item is the means testing of the PHI rebate (a net saving of $746 million in 2012-13) is not included in the budget measures as it is a delayed initiative of a previous budget. The new health budget measures in this budget involve net savings of $225 million over 4 years.
The AMA is particularly concerned by the proposed cuts to the PIP scheme including the cessation of the GP Immunisation Incentives program and linking participation in the PCEHR system to the e-Health PIP funding. The AMA has issued a media release in response to these measures and it can be read at http://ama.com.au/node/7772
The more significant items of new spending include:
The Government has effectively shut the door on new MBS listings for the time being. It has taken $142 million in savings from the MBS, with the extended Medicare safety net providing the bulk. Otherwise the more significant savings measures include:
The Budget delivers funding for the aged care reforms announced earlier this year. This is billed as a $3.7 billion reform over 5 years. Much of the funding was already budgeted. The new money provided over 5 years is $577 million.
Further information on individual health-related measures in the 2012-13 Budget can be found at the Department of Health and Ageing website.
On behalf of our members, the AMA will continue to seek more information from Government about individual measures and will continue to consult with Government to ensure that their implementation supports high quality, safe health care.
The AMA will continue to update members as information becomes available. In the meantime, if members have specific technical questions regarding the implementation of the Budget measures for which they would like the AMA to seek answers, please email them to ama@ama.com.au
The Practice Incentives program
e-Health
Dental health
Key issues for Doctors
The key issues for doctors are:
Snapshot of the Budget
HHF grants for regional and rural hospitals
Aged care
Funding for hospitals, MBS benefits and services (including the PHI rebate) and PBS benefits swallow over 80% of all health spending. This budget has no new spending on public hospitals per se, but does commit $38 million for the establishment of the National Health Funding Body. The means testing of the PHI rebate was an initiative of an earlier budget (the implementation was delayed by the Parliament) so the reduction in spending was already built into the budget figures. Otherwise, there are measures that save $142 million over 4 years {more}. For the PBS there are also minor net savings, $46.9 million over 4 years. The real action, therefore, is in aged care (which is classified functionally as part of social security and welfare):
Health Budget 2012-13: Highlights
![]() Health Budget Reflects The Economic Times AMA President, Dr Steven Hambleton said on Tuesday night that the government had done the right thing by sparing health from broad funding cuts to provide a budget for tough economic times and to fund a budget surplus. “This budget means that health costs should not add further pressure to the cost of living for Australian families.” Dr Hambleton said. “The AMA welcomes new funding for aged care, bowel cancer screening, dental services, health infrastructure, and electronic health initiatives. “We have strong objections to changes to Practice Incentive Payments (PIP). “The General Practice Immunisation Incentive has ceased. This has serious public health implications. “More broadly, we support funding for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) and key health services for Indigenous Australians under the Stronger Futures program. We still have concerns about the lack of medical care programs or funding in the aged care package, and the lack of incentives for doctors to embrace the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).” said Dr Hambleton. Click here to view the full media release. Budget Cuts to Practice Incentive Payments (PIP) Penalise GPs and Pose Public Health Risks AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said that Tuesday’s Budget cuts to Practice Incentive Payments (totalling $83.5 million over four years) have the potential to pose serious public health risks and undermine successful preventive health programs that are providing health benefits to many Australians. The Government introduced in the Budget a requirement that general practices must choose to participate in the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system if they are to continue receiving e-health PIP funding. Dr Hambleton said “This is not a requirement, it is a threat, and it comes on top of the Government’s failure to provide any new funding for the new clinical service that GPs are being asked to provide in helping patients prepare a shared health summary as part of the PCEHR.” Dr Hambleton also said the decision to discontinue the GP Immunisation Incentives Scheme is a public health risk of the highest order. “Australia is a world leader in childhood immunisation rates but this decision could undermine that reputation and undo a lot of hard work by parents, GPs and other health professionals who promote the importance of immunisation in the community and in schools. “Similarly, there has been no consultation on the increase in targets for the PIP Cervical Screening Incentive and the PIP Diabetes Incentive, and this will put the brakes on successful prevention and care programs that are helping thousands of people.” Dr Hambleton said. Click here to view the full media release. Senate Hearing into Factors Affecting the Supply of Medical Workforce in Rural Areas AMA President Dr Steve Hambleton and Chair of the AMA Rural Medical Committee Dr David Rivett are giving evidence today to the Senate Community Affairs Committee Hearing into factors affecting the supply of medical workforce in rural areas. At the hearing, the AMA will reiterate its support for the five solutions to help bolster medical workforce in regional and rural Australia listed in the AMA Position Statement ‘Regional/Rural Workforce Initiatives 2012”: These solutions focus on the need to:
CMO’s PIP Breast Implant Report and associated fact sheets Australian Government Chief Medical Officer Professor Chris Baggoley this week released his report into PIP Breast Implants. This report aims to present the information available at the moment, to provide answers to common questions and to assist women who have to make choices about their own PIP breast implants. The report indicates that so far, scientific tests have identified some differences between the PIP breast implants and other brands of silicone breast implants, but these differences are small and do not indicate that there is an increased safety risk associated with PIP implants. According to the report, as of 12 April 2012, the TGA had received 288 reports of rupture of PIP breast implants of which 250 were confirmed, 38 were unconfirmed due to insufficient information to uniquely identify the patient, the implant used or to verify that a rupture has occurred. The Therapeutic Goods Administration and international bodies will continue to accumulate evidence as part of their ongoing activities and Professor Baggoley expected that there will be more information to review. Click here for the CMO’s report and the associated fact sheets. Short Course: Dealing With Difficult People and Situations (for practice staff) – Register Now! There are times when all of us will find ourselves in situations where the behaviour of people around us impacts on us in a negative way. This could be when dealing with a discourteous, demanding or aggressive patient, employer or employee. Regardless of who the person with the challenging behaviour is there are specific strategies, which can be used to better manage the situation. Those often-uncontrolled emotions of anxiety, negative thoughts, anger, lack of patience and avoidance can all be managed. We encourage you to enrol your practice staff in this course to equip them with the skills and confidence to deal with these difficult situations. There is a discounted enrolment fee for practice staff of current AMA members. Date: Wednesday 30 May Register online now or by calling (03) 9347 3373. Free tool to track registration requirements (AMA CPD Tracker) The AMA has developed a free online tool to help doctors to keep track of the information they need to meet the Medical Board of Australia’s annual continuing professional development requirements. Each September practitioners, when renewing their Medical Board registration, may be required to provide evidence they have complied with the Board’s continuing professional development (CPD) requirements. The AMA CPD Tracker has been developed to enable doctors to progressively gather and organise the information needed to substantiate declarations made to the Board about CPD, so that evidence can be quickly and easily produced on demand. The AMA CPD Tracker can be used to:
The system keeps a tally of hours, enabling practioners to keep track of what needs to be completed before the end of the registration year. The Tracker has been developed taking full account of the requirements set out in the Medical Board’s Continuing Professional Development Registration Standard. The service is free to AMA members. Non-members can subscribe for an annual fee of $250. Click Here to register for AMA CPD Tracker. We welcome your comments and suggestions as well. Please tell us what you think.
Getting away from it all is good for you, and now Hertz is making it cheaper for AMA members with a special new offer - $20 off rentals of four days or more. This offer is in addition to your exclusive discounted AMA rate, and free membership to Hertz #1 Gold which offers priority service for frequent renters. The discount is available to AMA members at participating Hertz rental locations around Australia and when renting specified vehicle types. Simply call Hertz reservations on 13 30 39, or visit www.hertz.com.au and quote your Customer Discount Programme #283826 and Promotion Code 171835. |
|
|
AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said today that last night’s Budget cuts to Practice Incentive Payments (PIP) to GPs will have a double negative impact on the health system by penalising GPs for not meeting new higher targets for cervical cancer screening and specialised diabetes care and removing incentives for immunisation.
Dr Hambleton said these measures, along with changes to the e-health PIP, have the potential to pose serious public health risks and undermine successful preventive health programs that are providing health benefits to many Australians.
“These cuts go against the Government’s stated objectives of championing preventive health and being a world leader in electronic health,” Dr Hambleton said.
“They also place an even greater burden on the engine room of the Australian health system – hardworking GPs in suburbs and towns across the country.
“Last night, the Government introduced a requirement that general practices must choose to participate in the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) system if they are to continue receiving e-health PIP funding.
“This is not a requirement, it is a threat, and it comes on top of the Government’s failure to provide any new funding for the new clinical service that GPs are being asked to provide in helping patients prepare a shared health summary as part of the PCEHR.
“This double whammy represents a substantial roadblock to the effective implementation of the PCEHR and threatens Australia’s efforts to be a world leader in e-health.”
Dr Hambleton said the decision to discontinue the GP Immunisation Incentives Scheme is a public health risk of the highest order.
“Australia is a world leader in childhood immunisation rates but this decision could undermine that reputation and undo a lot of hard work by parents, GPs and other health professionals who promote the importance of immunisation in the community and in schools.
“Similarly, there has been no consultation on the increase in targets for the PIP Cervical Screening Incentive and the PIP Diabetes Incentive, and this will put the brakes on successful prevention and care programs that are helping thousands of people.
“These cuts are a big hit to general practice and quality patient care, and follow cuts in recent Budgets to joint injection rebates and mental health rebates, the loss of Medicare practice nurse rebates, earlier cuts to the GP Immunisation Incentives Scheme, and the imminent loss of the after hours PIP.
“The AMA will raise this issue with the Minister as a matter of urgency. Public health is far more important than a Budget surplus,” Dr Hambleton said.
The PIP Budget cuts total $83.5 million over four years.
9 May 2012
CONTACT: John Flannery 02 6270 5477 / 0419 494 761
AMA President Dr Steven Hambleton said tonight that the government had done the right thing by sparing health from broad funding cuts to provide a budget for tough economic times and to fund a budget surplus.
“Health has generally been sheltered from the budget cuts,” Dr Hambleton said.
“This budget means that health costs should not add further pressure to the cost of living for Australian families.
“The AMA welcomes new funding for aged care, bowel cancer screening, dental services, health infrastructure, and electronic health initiatives,” the AMA President said.
“The changes to the Extended Medicare Safety Net (EMSN) appear to have been based on clinical and economic evidence and do not involve services or procedures that are regularly required by families.
“We have strong objections to changes to Practice Incentive Payments (PIP).
“The General Practice Immunisation Incentive has ceased. This has serious public health implications.
“And GPs will only be eligible for the electronic PIP if they participate in the PCEHR. We will challenge this decision. This will be a roadblock to the system working properly.
“We also see problems with the cessation of Local Lead Clinician Groups. This may have a downside for the better management of hospitals.
“More broadly, we support funding for the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) and key health services for Indigenous Australians under the Stronger Futures program. We still have concerns about the lack of medical care programs or funding in the aged care package, and the lack of incentives for doctors to embrace the personally controlled electronic health record (PCEHR).
“With the budget returning to surplus, we encourage the Government to look to the future by bringing forward investments in medical research and medical training.
“As always, there may be devil in the detail. We will be looking at the fine print over coming days.”
8 May 2012
CONTACT: John Flannery 02 6270 5477 / 0419 494 761
Kirsty Waterford 02 6270 5464 / 0427 209 753
Follow the AMA Media on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ama_media
Follow the AMA President on Twitter: http://twitter.com/amapresident
The AMA National Conference 2012 – celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Federal AMA – will be held at the Grand Hyatt Hotel, Melbourne, from 25-27 May.
Conference highlights include:
Friday 25 May
10.00am Welcome to Country
Official Opening and Address
Professor David Haslam
President, British Medical Association
10.30am Policy Session: Leading for Difference
Women in Medicine: Dr Christine Bennett, Dean of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Sydney; Former Chair, National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission
Leading Medical Workforce Development: The Hon Jim McGinty, Chair, Health Workforce Australia
11.30am National Health Policy Overview
Address by the Minister for Health, The Hon Tanya Plibersek MP
Address by Shadow Minister for Health and Ageing, The Hon Peter Dutton MP
2.00pm Policy Session: Global Health on our Doorstep
Dr Nick Coatsworth, President, Médecins Sans Frontières, Australia
Associate Professor Christine Phillips, Social Foundations of Medicine, ANU
Benedict David, Principal Sector Specialist, Health, AusAid
4.00pm President’s Statement
AMA Roll of Fellows – New Fellows Inducted
7.30pm Leadership Development Dinner
Keynote Speaker: Simon McKeon, 2011 Australian of the Year
Saturday 26 May
9.00am Policy Session: Health and the Environment
Professor Tim Flannery, Chief Climate Commissioner
Professor Rob Adams, Director City Design, City of Melbourne
11.00am Awards ceremony
AMA/ACOSH National Tobacco Control Scoreboard Award – for best efforts by governments in tobacco control
AMA/ACOSH Dirty Ashtray Award – for worst efforts by governments in tobacco control
Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) Award – best original research published in the MJA
2.00pm Policy Session: Indigenous Health
The AMA and Indigenous Health: Progress to date and the challenges that remain – AMA President Dr Steve Hambleton
Presentation of the AMA Indigenous People’s Medical Scholarship
2.30pm Policy Session: Mental Health: Where to from here?
Dr Brian Morton, Chair, AMA Council of General Practice
Dr Bill Pring, Private Mental Health Alliance
Sunday 27 May
9.00am Keynote Address
Professor the Lord Darzi of Denham PC KBE, Former Health Minister in the United Kingdom, and Chair of Surgery at St Mary’s Hospital in London
9.45am Policy sessions
e-Health
Dr Chris Mitchell, Change and Adoption Lead, NEHTA
Second speaker (TBC)
MBBS vs MD
Professor Geoff McColl, Deputy Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Services, University of Melbourne
Dr Rob Marshall, Immediate Past President, AMSA
Media wishing to attend the Conference are invited to register by contacting Kirsty Waterford on 02 6270 5464 or 0427 209 753.
3 May 2012
CONTACT: John Flannery 02 6270 5477 / 0419 494 761
Kirsty Waterford 02 6270 5464 / 0427 209 753
![]() No extra MBS funding for preparing Shared Health Summaries The AMA President Dr Steve Hambleton met with the Department of Health and Ageing, the RACGP and other medical groups earlier this week to attempt to clarify the uncertainty about Medicare rebates for the Shared Health Summary for the PCEHR. At that meeting, Departmental officials confirmed that:
Consequently, the Government has not found it necessary to do any financial modeling on the impact of an increased use of items, or an escalation in the use of the more complex items (Level C and D), because of the introduction of the PCEHR and its key feature - the Shared Health Summary. In practice, this means that preparation and maintenance of a Shared Health Summary is inconsequential to a clinically relevant consultation that meets the complexity and time requirements of the existing MBS attendance items. The AMA advises its members to continue to bill MBS items according to the time and complexity requirements of the items, and to keep clinical notes that can substantiate the time and complexity of the patient consultation to the item billed. The AMA has introduced specific time-based items to prepare and maintain Shared Health Summaries that may be billed by any medical practitioner in addition to any patient consultation that might occur at the same time. The AMA believes that the Government should introduce similar items to the MBS to recognise this important new clinical service. Specific Commonwealth funding for this service is needed to ensure that the objectives of the PCEHR to reduce adverse events, avoid duplication, and improve coordination of care are met. AMA welcomes further steps towards a National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) The Government announcement that the first stage of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) will commence from July next year has been welcomed by the AMA, which has been pushing for such a national long-term care scheme for the severely disabled since 2003. “When fully implemented, the NDIS will provide fairness, equity, and a better quality of life for people with a disability, their families, and their carers,” Dr Steve Hambleton, AMA President, said. “The benefits for these members of our community, who are often overlooked, will be tremendous. For the first time, they will have certainty that their care needs will be met”. The AMA is preparing to work closely with the Government in developing and implementing the National Injury Insurance Scheme (NIIS) for people who are severely injured and require the same levels of support. “Over time, there is scope for both schemes to be integrated so that all Australians have access to early intervention and support, based on need, regardless of the cause or type of disability,” Dr Hambleton said. Click here to view the AMA press release. Health program targets veterans with greatest needs A major mail-out to GPs with patients most likely to benefit from the Coordinated Veterans’ Care (CVC) Program is being sent during early May by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA). Gold Card holders with chronic conditions and a high risk of being admitted to hospital are being identified through analysis of DVA’s client data. Letters are being sent to these identified candidates and their GPs. The CVC Program has been running for one year and has over 8,200 enrolments. Many of the participants have been identified by their GP. The AMA understands that analysis of the DVA data indicates that the candidates identified through the data analysis generally have a higher risk of hospitalisation than those identified by GPs. DVA is encouraging practices to focus on the patients listed in the targeted letters when considering potential participants for the CVC Program. Information about the CVC program for both patients and GPs is available at www.dva.gov.au/cvc.htm
Report Highlights Critical Shortage Of Training Positions For Medical Graduates A report released by the nation’s Health Ministers on 27 April 2012 shows there is a looming shortfall of training places for medical graduates and therefore a desperate need for Governments to fund extra pre-vocational and specialist training places, in order to keep pace with the number of graduates emerging from medical schools. The AMA had lobbied hard for the review, Health Workforce 2025, to be undertaken, and President Dr Steve Hambleton said Governments needed to act urgently on its findings to ensure Australia’s medical workforce met the community’s future health needs. According to the report, in 2016 there will be 3867 doctors who require a first year advanced specialist-training place, whereas the most recent data shows that there are currently only 2817 positions available. Even factoring some growth in these places, Health Workforce 2025 is still projecting a shortage of 451 training positions, highlighting the need for urgent action. Dr Hambleton said implementing the training plan will require significant funding, planning and coordination, which can only be achieved with support at the highest level across all Governments. The AMA strongly supports crucial work to be undertaken by Health Workforce Australia in drawing up an implementation plan. Click here to view the AMA press release.
GP Rural Incentives Program - overpayment adjustment The AMA was this week alerted to a problem with payments made by the Department of Human Services (DHS) to some GPs through the GP Rural Incentives Program (GPRIP) in August 2011. According to the DHS, a significant number of GPs, 293 in fact, were overpaid. These GPs have recently received advice from DHS to this effect and that their next payment would be adjusted by the overpayment. Concerned about the cash flow impact this could have for GPs, the AMA has confirmed with the DHS that practitioners so affected can arrange an alternative payment schedule. To do so, GPs should call the DHS on 1800 010 550. A smaller number of GPs (40) were underpaid the GRIP-GP payment but have since been reimbursed. Red Tape: Centrelink Forms Improved Following feedback from the AMA Red Tape Survey, the AMA has been working closely with the DHS to improve the forms for the Disability Support Pension Medical Report and the Centrelink Medical Certificate. The forms have been revised and are currently being tested ready for a June release. Changes to the forms include removal of duplicate questions, improvements to the clarity and logical flow of questions, and clarification under the reimbursement section that the time taken to complete the report counts towards the length of the consultation claimed. In addition, practitioners will be encouraged to complete and lodge the forms via HPOS. By completing the Disability Support Pension Medical Report via HPOS for example GPs will only see the questions they are required to answer. Going forward, the AMA and DHS are working on pre-population of forms and using previously created reports/certificates as the basis for generating a new report/certificate for that patient. AMA 2011 Annual Report Released The AMA has released its 2011 Annual Report. A copy is available at: http://ama.com.au/ama-annual-report-2011
We welcome your comments and suggestions as well. Please tell us what you think. The AMA CPD Tracking service is available to all medical professionals to help manage CPD recording requirements. This service is available free to AMA members and at a small cost to non members.
With $0 annual Card fee, $0 Supplementary Card1 fee and a choice of two great Rewards programs, the benefits of the AMA Gold Credit Card really add up – up to $300^ in value for our members. Find out more Cards are offered, issued and administered by American Express Australia Limited. Credit provided by American Express Australia Limited (ABN 92 1088 952 085). Australian Credit Licence No. 291313. ®Registered Trademark of American Express Company. ^ Indicative value only. The $300 value is comprised of: a $200 David Jones Gift Card if you apply, are approved and spend $500 on your Card within the first two months of receiving your Card (offer ends 31 December 2012), no annual Rewards program fee saving you $80 p.a and no annual Supplementary Card fees saving you $20 p.a. |
|
|
Australia’s ignominious history in regards to workforce planning took a step towards recovery last week with the release of the landmark report Health Workforce 2025. In terms of the training pipeline, HW2025 predicts a shortfall in registrar posts of 404 by 2015 and 1,265 by 2025. This means that a considerable bottleneck at the point of entry into vocational training is imminent. The other major findings of the report are summarised below. HW2025 demands a response from Health Ministers, and our challenge now is to ensure that we get a satisfactory one. They have indicated that reform is necessary, but how that agenda will be progressed remains unclear. In the immediate future, governments (with advice from medical colleges) have their work cut out for them in identifying and funding the required number of vocational training positions. We have already started thinking about how the AMA can report on progress against the targets implied by HW2025. The report also has implications for those proposing new medical schools. The predicted lack of training positions certainly doesn’t help their cause. In some respects, HW2025 poses more questions than it answers. But at least we have a blueprint for training a health workforce that is capable of meeting the healthcare needs of all Australians. On that note, it’s my time to sign off as your monthly correspondent. It’s been an honour holding the Deputy Chair and Chair positions and I thank members for the opportunity. Federal Council will ratify the appointment of the next Chair when it meets in a few weeks. I suspect that doctors in training will find themselves in very capable hands. Regards, Rob Health Workforce 2025 highlights shortage of training positions The first two volumes of Health Workforce 2025 (HW2025) were released on 27 April. The report modelled a number of different workforce scenarios, with the baseline scenario suggesting that by 2025 Australia will have progressively moved to a medical workforce deficit of 2700 doctors. The report also shows that Australia is likely to continue to be very reliant on International Medical Graduates. These numbers pale in comparison to the predicted shortfall of nurses. The report suggests that, Australia will need 109,409 more nurses by 2025 on the baseline scenario. As mentioned in the Chair’s report above, HW2025 also predicts a burgeoning bottleneck at the entrance to vocational training. It shows that the increases in medical student numbers since 2004 are having a positive workforce impact and that there is no real case to justify the opening of new medical schools, particularly in light of the lack of prevocational and vocational training places. In response to the report, the AMA has called on the Government to convene a Council of Australian Governments meeting specifically to reach agreement with the States and Territories on boosting pre-vocational and specialist medical training places in line with HW2025 projections. More specific modelling of each medical speciality is expected to be released in June. Read the AMA media release on the report and Volume 1 of the report itself on the Health Workforce Australia web-site. You may also be interested in reading some commentary from The Australian.
AMA Leadership Development Dinner: book now! Have you booked a ticket to the 2012 AMA National Conference and Leadership Development Dinner (LDD)? Don’t miss out on attending this once a year event, which promises to be thought provoking and inspiring. 2011 Australian of the Year Simon McKeon (Chairman of Macquarie Group’s Melbourne office, CSIRO and Business for Millennium Development) is the guest speaker at this year’s dinner, which will be held at Chapter House, 197 Flinders Lane, Melbourne on Friday, 25 May 2012 from 7:30pm until late. The cost is $65 for students and $75 for doctors in training. Go to the AMA National Conference website to register. Don't miss out on this special offer for DiTs to attend National Conference for $500. That's half price! Register now The AMA Council of Doctors in Training has created a new Doctors in Training (DIT) Network page at www.facebook.com/amacdt. Feel free to contribute to the discussion there. New plan to bolster the rural medical workforce The AMA recently released its position statement on Regional/Rural Workforce Initiatives, which sets out a practical achievable plan to attract doctors and medical students to live and work in rural and regional Australia. The statement highlights five key priority areas for national policy development and urges the Government to:
The Position Statement also makes clear the AMA’s views on the Bonded Medical Places program, and its support for the HECS Reimbursement Sheme. Further, it highlights the significant ongoing concern at the way in which the Australian Standard Geographical Classification – Remoteness Areas (ASGC-RA) is being applied to determine the distribution of financial incentives. Guidelines and resources on prescribing drugs of addiction The AMA Therapeutics Committee has developed a ‘one-stop-shop’ webpage for AMA members seeking advice on prescribing drugs of addiction. The page includes links to:
View the Prescribing drugs of addiction support page on the AMA website (Remember you need to log in with your member details first). A direct link to the page is also located on the AMA members' home page in the box titled AMA information and resources. Comments are welcome. Just use the section at the bottom of the page. Survey follows doctors as they build their careers Did you know that 34% of medical students who ranked surgery as their preferred area of practice in medical school changed their preference to specialist areas such as anaesthesia and emergency medicine by the time they entered their intern year? Such is the information we can access through the Medical Schools Outcomes Database and Longitudinal Tracking (MSOD) Project. The MSOD Project provides unique insights into the needs and aspirations of medical students and junior doctors. All students and doctors are encouraged to complete the surveys to provide the most reliable dataset possible. The MSOD Project publishes bi-annual newsletters to provide participants, stakeholders, medical schools and other interested parties with updates of project activities. Read the latest newsletter here. We welcome your comments and suggestions. Please tell us what you think. The AMA CPD Tracking service is available to all medical professionals to help manage CPD recording requirements. This service is available free to AMA members and at a small cost to non members.
We are pleased to announce unprecedented discounts for AMA members on leading tech brands such as HP, Lenovo, Fuji Xerox and HP. Simply click on the product of your choice and find out how to save big dollars.
^Terms and Conditions apply. See www.powerbuy.com.au for details. |
| |||||||||||||||
|
This publication reports on the operations of the Australian Medical Association for the year ended 31 December 2011. You can download the full Report or Sections of the Report below:
FULL PUBLICATION (1.1 MB PDF)
SECTIONS
1. PRESIDENT’S REPORT (60.23 KB PDF)
2. SECRETARY GENERAL’S REPORT (68.08 KB PDF)
3. YEAR IN REVIEW (764.84 KB PDF)
4. FINANCIAL REPORT (333.62 KB PDF)
5. AMA COMMITTEE REPORTS & LISTS (480.39 KB PDF)
The AMA fully supports efforts to ensure there is nationally consistent data definition, collection of high quality comparable data and regular transparent reporting of that data.
While ever there is inconsistency in the data collected for public hospital services, there can be no transparency of the real impact on public patients waiting for medical care across Australia.
All patients who have been assessed by a medical practitioner as requiring surgery to address a health condition should have their operation as soon as possible.
Patients wait for medical care because the public hospital system does not have the capacity to treat them at the time a medical practitioner first identifies the clinical need for surgery.
Consequently, governments use elective surgery urgency categories as a means of rationing the treatment provided by public hospitals. The AMA notes that no such system of allocating patients to categories exists in the private hospital sector.
The system of allocating patients to elective surgery categories and monitoring and reporting on the time people wait from being allocated a category until their surgery simply highlights the inadequacy of public hospitals to meet the demands being placed on them.
The AMA recognises that the scope of the task the Standing Council on Health has given to the AIHW and RACS is limited to developing national definitions for elective surgery categories – the result of which will not improve access to elective surgery. However, there are other steps that are needed to provide a clear and accurate picture of public elective surgery.
Definitions for elective surgery categories
Given that elective surgery categories are used to ration patient care in public hospitals, it is important for good patient care that national definitions for elective surgery categories facilitate patients being prioritised for surgery fairly and equitably. Public patients must be able to access elective surgery within clinically appropriate timeframes and before their clinical situation worsens.
Medical practitioners make decisions about what elective surgery category a patient should be placed in based on an assessment of the patient as a whole. Category definitions should take into account all the factors relevant to a patient’s requirement for elective surgery, and not be limited to the type of procedure the patient requires or the volume of procedures.
The particular condition is one aspect. Co-morbidities and other patient factors such as chronic diseases, disabilities, and, where appropriate, non-clinical factors, such as social/economic issues are factors that determine the clinical urgency of the surgery.
For example, hysterectomy for cancer may be more urgent that for menorrhagia which may be more urgent than for fibroids. However, menorrhagia in the face of refractory anaemia would change the urgency. Similarly, an elderly patient living alone will require surgery sooner to maintain independence. In assessing patients for surgery, surgeons are guided by information provided by referring general practitioners regarding patient circumstances.
We are aware that in certain states/territories or in certain regions, medical practitioners know that if a patient’s elective surgery is defined as the lowest category, it will almost never be done. This situation is unacceptable for the patient, places medical practitioners in an ethical and clinical dilemma, and may account for some of the differences in elective surgery data across jurisdictions.
The primary driver for surgeons to categorise elective surgery patients will always be clinical urgency. This autonomous decision making by medical practitioners can be justified and supported by guidelines or tools to take into account the variability between patients with the same condition. These tools, which could be developed by the medical colleges and specialty societies, would assist in the categories being applied consistently across the country. The AMA notes that in 2009 the Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC) commissioned a project to develop a model for nationally consistent elective surgery listing practises, data collection and reporting. The outcomes of this project may provide a basis for the development of these tools.
Further, there should be clear protocols for placing patients in the ‘not ready for care’ category (which should always be for a medical reason) or removing them from a waiting list. There must be clear documentation of the reason a patient is in the ‘not ready for care’ category or removed from a waiting list. There should also be a mandatory review period.
Waiting times
The truest measure of the length of time public patients wait for surgery is from when they are referred by their general practitioners to specialists for assessment. While ever this period of time is not counted, the elective surgery waiting time data grossly understates the real time people wait for surgery. The true picture of the demand on the public hospital sector and the impact on public patients is hidden.
The Council of Australian Governments does not consider the hidden waiting list a priority – consideration will only be given to developing a measure of surgical access from general practitioner referral to surgical care for future agreements (National Partnership Agreement for Improving Public Hospital Services, 2011, pg 25, clause A54(c)).
Nevertheless, this project presents an opportunity to implement arrangements to count the waiting time from the GP referral.
Public hospital capacity
The reality is that insufficient public hospital capacity is the cause of people waiting too long for elective surgery. Fiscal pressures in jurisdictions combined with performance reporting leads to strong incentives for inconsistent application (i.e. data manipulation) of national definitions to paint a better picture of the capacity of hospitals to meet demand. Financial rewards or penalties for ‘good’ or ‘bad’ performance can have a similar effect.
Introducing national definitions will not (of themselves) overcome these situations. Clearly articulated elective surgery waiting list practises, data collection and reporting is needed. The AMA points again to the work commissioned by AHMAC in 2009, but apparently not completed.
Taking all these steps – introducing national definitions, counting the full waiting time for elective surgery, and applying them consistently across the country – will require a strong commitment from governments, hospital administrators and medical practitioners responsible for assigning patients to elective surgery urgency categories.
Only when we have a commitment to these activities will there be a true picture of the demands on the public hospital sector and the ability to make fully informed decisions about public hospital service planning, delivery and resourcing.
APRIL 2012
Contact
Georgia Morris
Senior Policy Advisor
Medical Practice and eHealth
Australian Medical Association
Ph: (02) 6270 5466
gmorris@ama.com.au
| Attachments | Size |
|---|---|
| 115.45 KB |
The AMA welcomes the Prime Minister’s announcement that the first stage of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) will commence from July next year.
AMA President, Dr Steve Hambleton, said today that the AMA has been pushing for a national long-term care scheme for the severely disabled since 2003.
“When fully implemented, the NDIS will provide fairness, equity, and a better quality of life for people with a disability, their families, and their carers,” Dr Hambleton said.
“The benefits for these members of our community, who are often overlooked, will be tremendous.
“For the first time, they will have certainty that their care needs will be met.
“The NDIS is an investment in the future and in the quality of the lives of people with disabilities. It will allow people to participate in daily life and in the community in a more productive and positive way.
“The NDIS is transformational reform for the benefit of the most vulnerable people in our community,” Dr Hambleton said.
Dr Hambleton said the AMA is preparing to work closely with the Government in developing and implementing the National Injury Insurance Scheme (NIIS) for people who are severely injured and require the same levels of support.
“Over time, there is scope for both schemes to be integrated so that all Australians have access to early intervention and support, based on need, regardless of the cause or type of disability,” Dr Hambleton said.
CONTACT: John Flannery 02 6270 5477 / 0419 494 761
Kirsty Waterford 02 6270 5464 / 0427 209 753
Follow the AMA Media on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ama_media
Follow the AMA President on Twitter: http://twitter.com/amapresident
The AMA has warned patient access to medical care could become increasingly difficult unless urgent action is taken to address a looming shortfall of training places for medical graduates.
The AMA says a report released by the nation’s Health Ministers today shows there is a desperate need for Governments to fund extra pre-vocational and specialist training places in order to keep pace with the number of graduates emerging from medical schools.
The AMA had lobbied hard for the review, Health Workforce 2025, to be undertaken, and President Dr Steve Hambleton said Governments needed to act urgently on its findings to ensure Australia’s medical workforce met the community’s future health needs.
“The report provides a compelling case for Governments to commit the extra resources needed to ensure that medical graduates have access to quality training places in the future,” Dr Hambleton said, adding that he welcomed the acknowledgement by Health Ministers of the need for coordinated action.
The AMA President said the number of medical students was growing rapidly, with more than 3700 expected to be graduating by 2014. But they need to complete pre-vocational and specialist training following graduation, and Health Workforce 2025 shows that the surge in graduate numbers will soon exceed the number of training places currently available.
According to the report, in 2016 there will be 3867 doctors who require a first year advanced specialist-training place, whereas the most recent data shows that there are currently only 2817 positions available. Even factoring some growth in these places, Health Workforce 2025 is still projecting a shortage of 451 training positions, highlighting the need for urgent action.
“Without these extra training places, thousands of junior doctors will not be able to achieve specialist qualification, and the community will not realise the full benefit of its investment in increased medical school places,” Dr Hambleton said.
He said implementing the training plan will require significant funding, planning and coordination, which can only be achieved with support at the highest level across all Governments. The AMA strongly supports crucial work to be undertaken by Health Workforce Australia in drawing up an implementation plan.
Dr Hambleton urged the Commonwealth to convene a Council of Australian Governments meeting specifically to reach agreement with the States and Territories on boosting pre-vocational and specialist medical training places in line with the Health Workforce 2025 report.
27 April 2012
CONTACT: John Flannery 02 6270 5477 / 0419 494 761
Leading for DifferenceWomen in Medicine - Christine Bennett A reflection on the number and position of women in medicine 50 years ago, some of the outstanding women leaders in medicine over the last 50 years and a look to the future: women in medicine over the next 20 years. Leading Medical Workforce Development - Jim McGinty The growth and development of the medical workforce over the last 50 years, planning for the medical workforce past and present and how the medical workforce will change over the next 20 years.
|
Global Health on our DoorstepHealth care needs and obligations are not always confined to national borders in a globalised world of developing and developed nations, where war, political oppression and natural disasters are, sadly, regular features. Australia and Australian health care professionals have a substantial history of providing health and medical assistance in the international context. That assistance has ranged from involvement in international humanitarian interventions, through to the challenges of providing appropriate health and mental health care to those who are in Australia seeking asylum or who have refugee status. These challenges include, among other things, the diversity of refugees in Australia, the spectrum of medical conditions involved, and the cultural and linguistic barriers to care. Sometimes it is also in Australia’s interests to support its neighbours in dealing with health issues that may otherwise become threats to the Australian population. This is currently the case with TB in certain areas of Papua New Guinea. This conference session provides an insight into these aspects of global and refugee health, and the role of medical professionals. |
Applying lean thinking to your practice Lean systems improve processes, eliminate waste, reduce delays and improve both quality and productivity. Implementation of Lean concepts can help you provide transformational leadership and a better organisation that provides improved service. Participants in this workshop will gain insights into: - methods used to identify areas of inefficiency and waste in their organisation or business - practical approaches that can be used to improve efficiency and reduce waste - ways to improve access to medical care - ways to improve the patient experience of medical care The focus will be on application of the five principles of Lean to medical practices and hospital settings. Who should attend: practice owners, practice managers, present and future specialists in hospital and private practice |
Practice Development LifecycleThis session will outline the following phases of business as it applies to medical practices:
Key components of each stage will be considered. This interactive workshop will provide an opportunity to discuss the tipping points that occur at each stage that lead to success or limitation in growth of the organisation The key roles played by the medical practitioners will be outlined including their leadership skills and their ability to foster a successful team. |
Health and the EnvironmentThe phrase ‘think globally, act locally’ has had many applications since it was popularized in the 1960s by the environmental movement. Its application to health and healthcare is still as relevant as ever today. The issue of climate change and global warming has become very prominent in public and policy debate, including the potential adverse impacts of climate change on people’s health. An increasing emphasis in the public discussion of this global issue is what individuals, professionals and organisations can do at a local level to minimize these impacts, particularly with regard to reducing CO2 emissions. People’s health is not only shaped by the character and quality of the natural environment, but also by the built environment. Not only do our urban environments produce CO2 emissions, the design of the built environment influences individuals’ behaviours and the health risk factors they are exposed to. There are many ways that sustainability and better health can be built into the urban environment. This conference session will examine both of these relationships between health and the environment |
How to be an Effective Meeting ParticipantLeaders and advocates are inevitably required to attend meetings and this workshop aims to equip participants with the knowledge and skills to make the most of them. In order to simulate an actual meeting, participants will seated in boardroom style and everyone will be invited to share their insights and experiences. As a result, the workshop will be restricted to no more than 30 participants. |
The AMA Indigenous Health: Progress to Date and the Challenges that Remain
The AMA has a strong history of advocating for improvements to the health of Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders. One of the major vehicles for this advocacy is the publication of the AMA’s annual report cards on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health. Since 2002, these Report Cards have focused on a particular aspect of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health, investigated the facts and evidence, and made sound policy and program recommendations for long-term improvement. This conference session will reflect on what the Governments’ policies and actions have been over the years in relation to the AMA’s recommendations regarding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health. A short audit of AMA progress to date and challenges that remain will be released by the AMA President, and Chair of the AMA Taskforce on Indigenous Health, Dr Hambleton Each year, the AMA has also offered a scholarship to an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander student to complete his or her studies in medicine. Many recipients have gone on to solid and successful careers in medicine, often working in Aboriginal communities. The AMA President will also take the opportunity at this session to formally present the AMA’s Indigenous Peoples’ Medical Scholarship to the 2012 winner.
|