The Council of Australian Governments (COAG) Agreement 2010 outlines the agreement reached by all jurisdictions, except Western Australia, to establish a National Health and Hospitals Network (NHHN). The NHHN Agreement incorporates structural reforms as well as additional investments in hospital, primary and aged care services, and preventive care in mental health and diabetes health care.
Further initiatives announced in the Commonwealth Government’s Budget on 12 May 2010 include support for practice nurses, improved primary care infrastructure and the roll-out of electronic health records, bringing the total new health investment over the next five years to $7.3 billion. More information on this can be found in the AMA's media release.
The structural reforms include:
Additional investments include:
A workplan for implementing the reforms will be developed over the next few months for COAG agreement by 30 June 2010.
Comparison with AMA Priority Investment Plan
Key synergies
Single public hospital funding pool – greater transparency and more direct funding to hospitals. Funding allocation not made by state treasuries. National targets and standards, for example in emergency and elective surgery waiting times, strengthens accountability.
No Commonwealth takeover of public hospitals – States remain system managers and retain responsibility for negotiating and implementing service agreements with LHNs.
Stronger health care investment – additional funding invested into public hospitals and a stronger commitment and capacity for funding future growth.
Clinician engagement – potential for more clinician engagement in health care decision-making through LHN governing councils although will need to be monitored. Need to ensure clinicians are fully involved in the setting of targets, development of service agreements and monitoring of the system.
Local hospital governance – no Commonwealth takeover of hospitals. LHNs will have responsibility for the management of local hospitals and States will retain their service planning function. However, state control will need to be monitored to ensure the spirit and intent of the agreement is not compromised.
Teaching and research investment – separate funding maintained for teaching and research activity, although need to ensure funding is transparent and not diverted.
Capital investment – separate funding maintained for capital funding, although need to ensure funding is transparent and not diverted.
Hospital beds investment – more funding provided for additional subacute hospital beds and hospital capacity overall, but not enough. Need to ensure funding is implemented immediately. Implementation needs to be done in consultation with doctors and nurses.
Transparent national targets, standards and performance reporting – national targets and performance indicators will be developed, but process must be robust and consultative and involve the medical profession.
Clear accountability mechanisms – Commonwealth targets for elective surgery and emergency waiting times provide the opportunity to ensure that service agreements struck between states and LHNs include sufficient activity based funding to meet these targets.
General practice investment - additional funding provided for practice nurses and general practice infrastructure although falls short of what is needed.
Aged care investment – additional investment provided in aged care but insufficient to ensure existing places remain viable and new places are established.
Health workforce investment – additional investment in the health workforce is broadly consistent with AMA calls.
Mental health investment – additional investment in mental health provided but insufficient.
eHealth investment – funding to establish electronic health record system although additional support will be needed so that medical practices’ information technology capability is compatible with the new eHealth environment.
Key differences
Single public hospital funder – no single public funder of public hospitals but single funding pool achieved for activity based funding payments, therefore no sole responsibility at government level for public hospital funding.
Hospital bed investment – no commitment to ensure 85% hospital bed occupancy rate and no guarantee of new beds opening, although incentives through additional funding have been provided immediately to encourage opening of new subacute beds and possibly more aged care beds. No clear accountability mechanism to ensure new funding is used to improve hospital capacity within agreed timeframes, except for setting elective surgery and emergency waiting time targets.
Effective price for hospital services – COAG has agreed to the development of an ‘efficient’ price by an independent hospital pricing authority. An ongoing concern is how hospital-specific costs will be accommodated.
Realistic, transparent and achievable hospital-level targets and standards – yet to see how funding to LHNs will occur in practice: will States negotiate service agreements with LHNs that provide for realistic volumes; will the nationally efficient price be realistic and accommodate hospital-specific costs; and will sufficient contingency funding be available to allow sufficient capacity to meet unforeseen, short-term demand which is out of hospitals’ control?
Preventative health strategy – no comprehensive preventative health strategy – only diabetes and mental illness provided with additional funding.
Diabetes management – diabetes management plan requires enrolment with a practice, breaking the doctor-patient relationship and operates under a non fee-for-service model.
Indigenous health care investment – no additional funding for Indigenous health care, although health care announcements overall will provide some additional support.
In addition, no: